屁股癢的下場，就會淪落現在猛趕功課的狀態。
其實也預料會有這種下場，可是似乎是連做的動力都沒有。
無可否認的事，我真的很不喜歡我現在的multimedia老師！
我的功課目前全是靠之前的老師教的，還有自己累積下來的researches來做。
他？靠他真的死的人多！不是不要問他，問了也白問。
親眼目睹這位馬來lecturer回答同學的答案是：“Research yourself !” 多謝他這麼完美的答案。
我算算也有好幾次沒去上他的課了，我想我最後一次會看到他，應該是下星期的presentation吧！
我心裡有數，這次應該沒有機會拿A了。
不過，我想清楚了~ 無論極討厭都好，還是把功課做好吧！畢竟這是我的專業。
最後的衝刺！

嗯~最近我的佛珠斷掉啦！唉喲喲~嚇到我！
害我極沒有安全感，昨晚半夜沒有關燈睡覺，突然燈管閃閃閃！！！
哇老~我還以為哪一條鬼來作弄我！
原來，燈管壞掉了！真是去他媽的~
不過老實說，可能習慣了，沒有帶會少少沒有安全的說。
嗯~anyway...... 它的精神用在~ 回向給我的佛珠。
阿~阿彌~阿彌彌~阿彌陀佛~~~~(Rap rap rap! yoyoyo!!!)
哈哈哈~給我老娘看到還不宰我了？！

做了一個蠻有趣的心理測驗，不妨試一試吧！
http://8word.net/test/mbti/test.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

職業性格心理測驗

分析：您的性格類型是「ISTP」( 冒險家 )

        容忍，有彈性；是冷靜的觀察者，但當有問題出現，便迅速行動，找出可行的解決方法。能夠分析哪些東西可以使事情進行順利，又能夠從大量資料中，找出實際問 題的重心。很重視事件的前因後果，能夠以理性的原則把事實組織起來，重視效率。 ISTP型的人坦率、誠實、講求實效，他們喜歡行動而非漫談。他們很謙遜，對於完成工作的方法有很好的理解力。 ISTP型的人擅長分析，所以他們對客觀含蓄的原則很有興趣。他們對於技巧性的事物有天生的理解力，通常精於使用工具和進行手工勞動。他們往往做出有條理 而保密的決定。他們僅僅是按照自己所看到的、有條理而直接地陳述事實。 ISTP型的人好奇心強，而且善於觀察，只有理性、可靠的事實才能使他們信服。他們重視事實，簡直就是有關他們知之甚深的知識的寶庫。他們是現實主義者， 所以能夠很好地利用可獲得的資源，同時他們擅於把握時機，這使他們變得很講求實效。ISTP型的人平和而寡言，往往顯得冷酷而清高，而且容易害羞，除了是 與好朋友在一起時。他們平等、公正。他們往往受衝動的驅使，對於即刻的挑戰和問題具有相當的適應性和反應能力。因為他們喜歡行動和興奮的事情，所以他們樂 於戶外活動和運動。

您適合的領域有：技術領域 證券、金融業、貿易、商業領域 戶外、運動、藝術等

您適合的職業有：

• 資訊經理
• 程式設計師
• 律師助理
• 消防員
• 私人偵探
• 藥劑師
• 證券分析員
• 銀行職員
• 管理顧問
• 財務顧問
• 電子專業人士
• 技術培訓人員
• 信息服務開發人員
• 軟件開發商
• 海洋生物學者
• 後勤與供應經理
• 經濟學者
• 貿易商
• 商品經銷商
• 產品代理商（有形產品)
• 警察
• 偵探
• 體育工作者
• 賽車手
• 飛行員
• 雕塑家
• 手工製作
• 畫家

這個時間其實我本來就已經在睡覺了，但是因為大牙後的牙肉腫了，嘴巴有點不爽的說，應該是發熱氣了呀！不過沒關係，吞了一些成藥暫時舒緩了一下，星期一就回家了嘛~呵呵！說起來這一次難得的假期，其實也不輕鬆的，因為老師已經丟了很多事情讓我們在這星期假期的時候不會太悶，真是為我們設想周到呀！不過這也是意料中事~

今天剛去光顧了我的偶像卡通的網頁：-兔斯基，真的是太可愛了！
我也一次過下載所有的wallpaper, screensaver, emotions......等等（下載我的學校功課都沒有這樣快 =.=lll）

 

好久沒好好認真的來看看我的部落格~kesiannya~!它被我拋棄足足好一段時間了。

  

 

这是一篇真人真事的故事。。。
A man sat at a metro station in Washington DC and started to play the violin; it was a cold January morning. He played six Bach pieces for about 45 minutes. During that time, since it was rush hour, it was calculated that thousands of people went through the station, most of them on their way to work.
 
Three minutes went by and a middle aged man noticed there was a musician playing. He slowed his pace and stopped for a few seconds and then hurried up to meet his schedule.
 
A minute later, the violinist received his first dollar tip: a woman threw the money in the till and without stopping continued to walk.
 
A few minutes later, someone leaned against the wall to listen to him, but the man looked at his watch and started to walk again. Clearly he was late for work.
 
The one who paid the most attention was a 3 year old boy. His mother tagged him along, hurried but the kid stopped to look at the violinist. Finally the mother pushed hard and the child continued to walk turning his head all the time. This action was repeated by several other children. All the parents, without exception, forced them to move on.
 
In the 45 minutes the musician played, only 6 people stopped and stayed for a while. About 20 gave him money but continued to walk their normal pace. He collected $32. When he finished playing and silence took over, no one noticed it. No one applauded, nor was there any recognition.
 
No one knew this but the violinist was Joshua Bell, one of the best musicians in the world. He played one of the most intricate pieces ever written with a violin worth 3.5 million dollars.
 
Two days before his playing in the subway, Joshua Bell sold out at a theater in Boston and the seats average $100.00 each.
 
This is a real story. Joshua Bell playing incognito in the metro station was organized by the Washington Post as part of a social experiment about perception, taste and priorities of people. The outlines were: in a commonplace environment at an inappropriate hour: Do we perceive beauty? Do we stop to appreciate it? Do we recognize the talent in an unexpected context?
 
One of the possible conclusions from this experience could be:
 
If we do not have a moment to stop and listen to one of the best musicians in the world playing some of the best music ever written, how many other things are we missing?